(937) 439-5789 7071 Corporate Way, Suite 101 · Dayton, OH 45459
‹ Blog Child Custody

Shared Parenting vs. Sole Custody in Ohio

Ohio courts allocate parental rights and responsibilities in one of two ways: primarily to one parent, or to both parents under an approved shared parenting plan. Here is how each works.

Ohio courts do not decide “custody” in the way television does. The court allocates parental rights and responsibilities for the care of the children—and it has two structures to choose from: primarily to one parent, or to both parents under an approved shared parenting plan.

What the Court Is Actually Allocating

In any divorce, legal separation, or annulment proceeding—and in any proceeding about the allocation of parental rights and responsibilities—R.C. 3109.04(A) directs the court to “allocate the parental rights and responsibilities for the care of the minor children of the marriage.” That allocation covers both the day-to-day physical care of the children and the legal authority to make decisions for them.

Structure One: One Residential Parent and Legal Custodian

Under R.C. 3109.04(A)(1), the court may allocate parental rights and responsibilities primarily to one parent, designate that parent as the residential parent and the legal custodian, and divide the other rights and responsibilities between the parents—including, specifically, the right of the parent who is not the residential parent to have continuing contact with the children.

That is what people usually mean by “sole custody.” It does not remove the other parent from the case: parenting time and child support are decided in the same decree, and in a manner consistent with the best interest of the children.

Structure Two: Shared Parenting Under an Approved Plan

Under R.C. 3109.04(A)(2), if a parent files a pleading or motion under division (G) and a plan for shared parenting, and the court finds that a plan for shared parenting is in the best interest of the children and approves it, the court may allocate parental rights and responsibilities to both parents and issue a shared parenting order requiring the parents to share all or some of the aspects of the physical and legal care of the children, in accordance with the approved plan.

Two practical consequences follow. First, shared parenting is not automatic: a plan has to be filed and approved, and the court has to find it serves the children’s best interest. Second, the statute says the court shall not give preference to a parent because of that parent’s financial status or condition (division (F)(3)).

How a Shared Parenting Case Starts

R.C. 3109.04(G) allows either parent, or both parents, to file a pleading or motion asking the court to grant both parents shared parental rights and responsibilities. A parent who files that request must also file a plan for the exercise of shared parenting by both parents. If the court interviews a child under division (B), then under (B)(2)(a) the court may—and on the motion of either parent shall—appoint a guardian ad litem for the child.

The Best-Interest Factors

Whatever structure is at issue, R.C. 3109.04(B)(1) requires the court to take into account that which would be in the best interest of the children. Division (F)(1) lists the factors the court must consider, including:

The Extra Factors for Shared Parenting

When the specific question is whether shared parenting is in the best interest of the children, R.C. 3109.04(F)(2) requires the court to consider the (F)(1) factors, the deviation factors in R.C. 3119.23, and these additional factors:

The first two factors are why shared parenting often turns on how the parents communicate and whether each is willing to support the children’s relationship with the other parent—not simply on how much time each parent wants.

Parenting Time Under Either Structure

Where the court has not issued a shared parenting decree, R.C. 3109.051(A) requires the court to make a just and reasonable order permitting the parent who is not the residential parent to have parenting time with the child, unless the court determines that parenting time would not be in the child’s best interest—in which case it must include its findings of fact and conclusions of law in the journal. Whenever possible, the order is to ensure both parents the opportunity for frequent and continuing contact with the child, and the final decree must include a specific schedule of parenting time.

Child Support Follows the Allocation

Child support is calculated separately from the allocation of parental rights and responsibilities. For a shared parenting order, R.C. 3109.04(A)(2) provides that the parents’ child support obligations are determined under Chapters 3119., 3121., 3123., and 3125. of the Revised Code. For how the guidelines work, see How Is Child Support Calculated in Ohio?

Can the Allocation Be Changed Later?

R.C. 3109.04(E)(1)(a) sets a real threshold. The court shall not modify a prior decree allocating parental rights and responsibilities unless it finds, based on facts that have arisen since the prior decree or that were unknown to the court at the time, that a change has occurred in the circumstances of the child, the child’s residential parent, or either parent subject to a shared parenting decree—and that the modification is necessary to serve the best interest of the child. The court retains the residential parent designated by the prior decree unless a modification is in the best interest of the child and one of the following applies:

There is also a path in the other direction. Under R.C. 3109.04(E)(1)(b), one or both parents under a decree that is not a shared parenting decree may file a motion asking that it be modified to give both parents shared rights and responsibilities; the motion must include both the request for modification and a request for a shared parenting order that complies with division (G).

Which Structure Fits Your Family?

The answer is fact-specific, and the court’s decision is built from the factors above as applied to your children. What is worth knowing before a case begins is that the structure is not chosen by either parent unilaterally: the framework is statutory, the plan matters, and the standard at every step is the best interest of the child.

More on this area: Child Custody & Support, How Is Child Custody Decided in Ohio?, Who Gets the House in a Divorce in Ohio? and the Family Law FAQ.